Difference between revisions of "Debate:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim "there is no objective truth" also not an objective truth?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ymmotrojam (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So there must exist some objective truth? [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 10:39, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | So there must exist some objective truth? [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 10:39, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That is the ultimate failing point of postmodernist thinking. In philosophical terms, they say that each person has their own narrative (story), but any push of a meta narrative (overarching life story... eg. The Biblical God created the world and hs a plan for each of us) is viewed as oppressive. Of course then they become the oppressors because their meta narrative is that there should be no meta narrative :-). --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 10:45, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:45, March 31, 2007
So there must exist some objective truth? Jaques 10:39, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
- That is the ultimate failing point of postmodernist thinking. In philosophical terms, they say that each person has their own narrative (story), but any push of a meta narrative (overarching life story... eg. The Biblical God created the world and hs a plan for each of us) is viewed as oppressive. Of course then they become the oppressors because their meta narrative is that there should be no meta narrative :-). --Ymmotrojam 10:45, 31 March 2007 (EDT)