Difference between revisions of "Talk:Supreme Court Candidates, 2010"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(While I welcome good structure, I think your suggestion would obscure the political factors.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:While I welcome good structure, I think your suggestion would obscure the political factors.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:38, 10 April 2010 (EDT) | :While I welcome good structure, I think your suggestion would obscure the political factors.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:38, 10 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I don't follow --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 23:51, 10 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:51, April 11, 2010
A suggestion about layout
You might consider putting three headers under any candidate Qualifications, Pro's, and Con's. all likely candidates will have things worth noting in these three fields. --Brendanw 23:04, 10 April 2010 (EDT)
- While I welcome good structure, I think your suggestion would obscure the political factors.--Andy Schlafly 23:38, 10 April 2010 (EDT)
- I don't follow --Brendanw 23:51, 10 April 2010 (EDT)