Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal charity"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(About blood donations) |
(As liberals increase government and squeeze charity towards zero, those lifesaving blood donations inevitably dry up. Literally.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry to contradict you, Mr. Schlafly, But [[http://www.hema-quebec.qc.ca/anglais/index.htm| Héma-Québec]] is a government run blood bank. I didn't stop giving blood after they took over the red-cross (during the HIV-contaminated blood era about 20 years ago). The doughnuts are still the same :) [[User:AlainDion|AlainDion]] 18:37, 8 April 2010 (EDT) | Sorry to contradict you, Mr. Schlafly, But [[http://www.hema-quebec.qc.ca/anglais/index.htm| Héma-Québec]] is a government run blood bank. I didn't stop giving blood after they took over the red-cross (during the HIV-contaminated blood era about 20 years ago). The doughnuts are still the same :) [[User:AlainDion|AlainDion]] 18:37, 8 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Government can "run" a blood bank, but government cannot provide the essential component: the blood donations. That takes genuine charity. As liberals increase government and squeeze charity towards zero, those lifesaving blood donations inevitably dry up. Literally.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:07, 8 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:07, April 8, 2010
Sorry to contradict you, Mr. Schlafly, But [Héma-Québec] is a government run blood bank. I didn't stop giving blood after they took over the red-cross (during the HIV-contaminated blood era about 20 years ago). The doughnuts are still the same :) AlainDion 18:37, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
- Government can "run" a blood bank, but government cannot provide the essential component: the blood donations. That takes genuine charity. As liberals increase government and squeeze charity towards zero, those lifesaving blood donations inevitably dry up. Literally.--Andy Schlafly 19:07, 8 April 2010 (EDT)