Difference between revisions of "Argument (logic)"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'In logic, an '''argument''' is a a reason given in proof or rebuttal. It consists of one or more meaningful premises along with meaningful conclusion. Category: Logic')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
In logic, an '''argument''' is a  a reason given in proof or rebuttal. It consists of one or more meaningful premises along with meaningful conclusion.
 
In logic, an '''argument''' is a  a reason given in proof or rebuttal. It consists of one or more meaningful premises along with meaningful conclusion.
 +
 +
For example, the following is an argument:
 +
 +
*  Premise 1. All Greeks are human.
 +
* Premise 2. All humans are mortal.
 +
* Conclusion. All Greeks are mortal.
 +
 +
An argument should not be confused with a statement. To create an argument, the person making the claims must offer further statements which, at least in theory, support the claims. If the claim is supported, the argument is successful; if the claim is not supported, the argument fails. 
  
 
[[Category: Logic]]
 
[[Category: Logic]]

Revision as of 18:12, January 9, 2010

In logic, an argument is a a reason given in proof or rebuttal. It consists of one or more meaningful premises along with meaningful conclusion.

For example, the following is an argument:

  • Premise 1. All Greeks are human.
  • Premise 2. All humans are mortal.
  • Conclusion. All Greeks are mortal.

An argument should not be confused with a statement. To create an argument, the person making the claims must offer further statements which, at least in theory, support the claims. If the claim is supported, the argument is successful; if the claim is not supported, the argument fails.