Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ballistic missile"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Orbit and atmosphere)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
If you want to be precise: Even a thrown stone briefly orbits the Earth. ;) I would change the opening part to "missile which briefly goes into an exoatmospheric orbit" so you have a qualifier for the overly broad term "orbit". --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 17:09, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 
If you want to be precise: Even a thrown stone briefly orbits the Earth. ;) I would change the opening part to "missile which briefly goes into an exoatmospheric orbit" so you have a qualifier for the overly broad term "orbit". --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 17:09, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
:That's a good point.  Ballistic missiles, in modern usage, simply refers to missiles which leave the atmosphere.  None complete a full orbit, and in this sense they are not different from an ordinary missile.  It's the perigee of their trajectory which seperates them.  "orbits the Earth" is a bad term to use. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 23:23, 3 January 2010 (EST)

Revision as of 04:23, January 4, 2010

Orbit and atmosphere

If you want to be precise: Even a thrown stone briefly orbits the Earth. ;) I would change the opening part to "missile which briefly goes into an exoatmospheric orbit" so you have a qualifier for the overly broad term "orbit". --Jenkins 17:09, 20 September 2007 (EDT)

That's a good point. Ballistic missiles, in modern usage, simply refers to missiles which leave the atmosphere. None complete a full orbit, and in this sense they are not different from an ordinary missile. It's the perigee of their trajectory which seperates them. "orbits the Earth" is a bad term to use. JacobB 23:23, 3 January 2010 (EST)