Difference between revisions of "Talk:Line integral"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(good poitn) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Your point is a good one. Please feel free to make such substantive improvements directly on the content page. I'll build on your point now ... in the content entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:35, 26 December 2009 (EST) | :Your point is a good one. Please feel free to make such substantive improvements directly on the content page. I'll build on your point now ... in the content entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:35, 26 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Scylla: ''it is never appropriate for an editor to change the additions made by an Administrator'' | ||
| + | ::Charybdis: ''90/10'' | ||
| + | ::I was already blocked two times for three days, I tread carefully... [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] | ||
Revision as of 16:19, December 26, 2009
A line integral is the area under a function along a specified curve.
I have to admit that I have great difficulties to align this description with the usual definition of a line integral, i.e., something like
<math>\int_\mathbf{C} \langle \vec{f}(\vec{s}), d\vec{s} \rangle</math>
(I used this notation to stress the scalar product)
FrankC aka ComedyFan 09:16, 26 December 2009 (EST)
- Your point is a good one. Please feel free to make such substantive improvements directly on the content page. I'll build on your point now ... in the content entry.--Andy Schlafly 09:35, 26 December 2009 (EST)
- Scylla: it is never appropriate for an editor to change the additions made by an Administrator
- Charybdis: 90/10
- I was already blocked two times for three days, I tread carefully... FrankC aka ComedyFan