Difference between revisions of "Homosexual denial"
(that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "homosexual orientation") |
(some logical analysis) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*What happens in prison (or on board a ship) is a "special case" | *What happens in prison (or on board a ship) is a "special case" | ||
| − | Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "[[homosexual orientation]]". | + | Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "[[homosexual orientation]]". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument: |
| + | #[[Sex]] between males is immoral | ||
| + | #We are males, and we are having sex | ||
| + | #Therefore, what we are doing is immoral | ||
| + | The last proposition follows from the premises. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here, the denial consists in substituting the word ''homosexual'' or ''homosexuality'' in a misleading way: | ||
| + | #Homosexuality is sex between males having a [[homosexual orientation]]. | ||
| + | #We are males, and we are having sex | ||
| + | #Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral | ||
| + | #One or both of us is not "a homosexual" | ||
| + | No conclusion can be drawn from the premises. | ||
Revision as of 15:47, December 17, 2009
Homosexual denial consists of clever verbal manipulations by homosexuals trying to seduce same-sex partners, and by advocates of homosexuality trying to trick good people into condoning homosexual relations.
In seduction, one of the most common tactics employed is to pretend that intercourse between two males (or females) isn't really homosexuality:
- "We are just experimenting/exploring"
- "Bi-curious"
- What happens in prison (or on board a ship) is a "special case"
Seducers and advocates alike employ the argument that same-sex relations cannot be labeled as homosexual unless one or both parties has a "homosexual orientation". It's an attempt to subvert the following argument:
- Sex between males is immoral
- We are males, and we are having sex
- Therefore, what we are doing is immoral
The last proposition follows from the premises.
Here, the denial consists in substituting the word homosexual or homosexuality in a misleading way:
- Homosexuality is sex between males having a homosexual orientation.
- We are males, and we are having sex
- Society considers sexual contact between homosexuals immoral
- One or both of us is not "a homosexual"
No conclusion can be drawn from the premises.