Difference between revisions of "User talk:WLink"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Don't remove factual information from [[Theory of Relativity]]. Your [[censorship]] has been reverted.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | Don't remove factual information from [[Theory of Relativity]]. Your [[censorship]] has been reverted.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| − | None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. | + | None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. Further, the fact that information cannot travel faster than light is a conclusion, not an assumption, of relativity. |
| − | I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | + | I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? |
| + | --[[User:WLink|WLink]] 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:23, October 15, 2009
Don't remove factual information from Theory of Relativity. Your censorship has been reverted.--Andy Schlafly 09:09, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
None of the information I removed was factual- all physical models rely on assumptions, even Newtonian physics. The mathematics of special relativity is only marginally more complicated. Further, the fact that information cannot travel faster than light is a conclusion, not an assumption, of relativity.
I also added a reference to the standard model, which is the most successful theory of physics to date, and should be in the discussion of field theory. Also, do I reply here, or on the relativity talk page? --WLink 09:21, 15 October 2009 (EDT)