Difference between revisions of "Mens rea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The trend in trials and in legislation has been to weaken the requirement of proof of mens rea. A utilitarian view of justice does not depend on mens rea, while a moral view of justice does. | The trend in trials and in legislation has been to weaken the requirement of proof of mens rea. A utilitarian view of justice does not depend on mens rea, while a moral view of justice does. | ||
| − | + | ||
[[Category:Latin Legal Terms]] | [[Category:Latin Legal Terms]] | ||
Revision as of 00:45, March 27, 2007
Mens rea is the mental state of a criminal defendant. In Latin it means a guilty state of mind. Usually there are four levels of mens rea in crimes, from most serious to less serious:
1. intent
2. knowledge
3. recklessness
4. gross (criminal) negligence
The trend in trials and in legislation has been to weaken the requirement of proof of mens rea. A utilitarian view of justice does not depend on mens rea, while a moral view of justice does.