Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sonia Sotomayor"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
The concept of a "moderate" is liberal fiction.  Most of the important issues have no middle ground.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:53, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
 
The concept of a "moderate" is liberal fiction.  Most of the important issues have no middle ground.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:53, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:But Andy, doesn't it follow that if a judge comes down conservative on some issues, and liberal on others, than calling them moderate is accurate? [[User:JDWpianist|JDWpianist]] 18:00, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:00, May 27, 2009

Why Not a Moderate?

Is there any reason at the moment to mistrust the ABA's claim that she's politically moderate? If Ed Poor think's it a "biased claim," then it doesn't make sense to use the rest of the quote. But the rest of the article, her resume and what we know of her judicial record, seem to offer good evidence that she is a moderate. If evidence comes out to the contrary (rather than talking heads claiming she's an arch liberal), then it would only make sense to expose that here. JDWpianist 17:23, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

Well, judging how the liberal media presents her, she is in fact a liberal. is there such thing as a moderate-liberal? No

[1] [2] [3] --Jpatt 17:41, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

The concept of a "moderate" is liberal fiction. Most of the important issues have no middle ground.--Andy Schlafly 17:53, 27 May 2009 (EDT)

But Andy, doesn't it follow that if a judge comes down conservative on some issues, and liberal on others, than calling them moderate is accurate? JDWpianist 18:00, 27 May 2009 (EDT)