Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pirahna"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Not sure about the 'adams mother-in-law' comment!?! Sounds like it might be difficult to corroborate. Also, as a marine biologist, I'd question that from an evolutionary perspective, they were more related to sharks than any other bony fish!
+
Not sure about the 'adams mother-in-law' comment!?! Sounds like it might be difficult to substantiate. Also, as a marine biologist, I'd question that from an evolutionary perspective, they were more related to sharks than any other bony fish!

Latest revision as of 16:31, March 26, 2007

Not sure about the 'adams mother-in-law' comment!?! Sounds like it might be difficult to substantiate. Also, as a marine biologist, I'd question that from an evolutionary perspective, they were more related to sharks than any other bony fish!