Difference between revisions of "Agnosticism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
==Atheism and agnosticism==
 
==Atheism and agnosticism==
  
−
Some agnostics bristle at the term ''atheist''. They say they aren't atheists, because they don't "believe that God does not exist" but rather "neither believe nor disbelieve".  
+
Some agnostics bristle at the term ''atheist''. They say they aren't atheists, because they don't "believe that a god does not exist" but rather "neither believe nor disbelieve".  
  
 
Agnostics differ from regular [[Atheism|atheists]] in that they do not deny the existence of a god or gods.
 
Agnostics differ from regular [[Atheism|atheists]] in that they do not deny the existence of a god or gods.
  
−
Many religious believers make no distinction among non-believers. If you're not sure that God exists, they combine the unsure and "surely not" into one lump. For these believers, an "atheist" is anyone who doesn't believe in God.
+
Many religious believers make no distinction among non-believers. If you're not sure that a god exists, they combine the unsure and "surely not" into one lump. For these believers, an "atheist" is anyone who doesn't believe in a god.
  
 
Among those who have not decided whether to believe in a higher power, there are two main groups:
 
Among those who have not decided whether to believe in a higher power, there are two main groups:

Revision as of 14:10, May 16, 2009

David Hume

Agnosticism is, in weaker forms, an affirmation of ignorance regarding the existence of a higher power, and in stronger forms, the assertion that a god or gods' existence is not capable of being known (unknowable).

The proponent of the weaker form does not make a claim to knowledge about existence, but he simply suspends from making a decision. A suspension of decision, in terms of logic, does not have a truth value, and therefore he is not making an argument. The proponent of the stronger form goes a step further and makes a claim to knowledge by saying, I know that the existence of a god cannot be known. However, the stronger form does have a truth value, and therefore can be right or wrong. Either the proponent of stronger agnosticism is correct, that the existence of a higher power is not capable of being known, or he is incorrect.

The word "agnostic" was coined in 1869 by T. H. Huxley[1] from the Greek roots a- not, and -gnostic, knowing; the philosopher Herbert Spencer was influential in spreading its use. One nineteenth-century saw held that "There is no god but the Unknowable, and Herbert Spencer is his prophet."[2] David Hume and Bertrand Russell were famous agnostics. Two present famous agnostics are Larry King and Fidel Castro.

Agnosticism has become a fairly common belief system in Western culture with 14% of people in the United States, 32% of people in France and 35% of people in Great Britain self-identifying as agnostics.[3]

Atheism and agnosticism

Some agnostics bristle at the term atheist. They say they aren't atheists, because they don't "believe that a god does not exist" but rather "neither believe nor disbelieve".

Agnostics differ from regular atheists in that they do not deny the existence of a god or gods.

Many religious believers make no distinction among non-believers. If you're not sure that a god exists, they combine the unsure and "surely not" into one lump. For these believers, an "atheist" is anyone who doesn't believe in a god.

Among those who have not decided whether to believe in a higher power, there are two main groups:

  1. Those who simply haven't made a decision
  2. Those who declare no rational decision is possible, on the grounds that the existence of a god is not knowable.

Bertrand Russell once wrote that, in describing his beliefs,

I never know whether I should say 'Agnostic' or whether I should say 'Atheist'.... As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one [can] prove that there is not a God. On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods.[4]

Agnosticism and Uncharitableness

Per capita atheists and agnostics in the United States give significantly less to charity than theists.

See also

External links

References

  1. ↑ T. H. Huxley was also an early and influential supporter of Darwinism.
  2. ↑ London, Jack (1913), Martin Eden, Chapter 13
  3. ↑ http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=1131
  4. ↑ Russell, Bertrand (1947) Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic? Most online sources say "by which one prove," probably a mistake.