Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sadism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: One could simply sculpt it into a Conservapedia view. How would anybody make any articles based on fact if Wikipedia already has all those facts? --~~~~) |
(→Wording change: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One could simply sculpt it into a Conservapedia view. How would anybody make any articles based on fact if Wikipedia already has all those facts? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 14:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | One could simply sculpt it into a Conservapedia view. How would anybody make any articles based on fact if Wikipedia already has all those facts? --[[User:Eiyuu Kou|Eiyuu Kou]] 14:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Wording change == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi. I just changed the phrase "This is morally '''straightforward''' if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." To "This is morally '''wrong''' if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." I do not see how the first phrase made scene. I think it might have been liberal vandalism. --[[User:AmeliaJ|AmeliaJ]] 15:33, 28 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:33, December 28, 2008
One could simply sculpt it into a Conservapedia view. How would anybody make any articles based on fact if Wikipedia already has all those facts? --Eiyuu Kou 14:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Wording change
Hi. I just changed the phrase "This is morally straightforward if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." To "This is morally wrong if the victim is innocent, or does not consent." I do not see how the first phrase made scene. I think it might have been liberal vandalism. --AmeliaJ 15:33, 28 December 2008 (EST)