Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corruption"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Corruption doesn't belong under politics? I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --~~~~)
 
(nice edit, Rod, but watch out)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Corruption doesn't belong under politics?  I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 
Corruption doesn't belong under politics?  I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to [[Liberal corruption]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 14:37, December 18, 2008

Corruption doesn't belong under politics? I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --Gulik5 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to Liberal corruption. --Ed Poor Talk 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)