Difference between revisions of "Talk:Carcinogen"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Estrogen is a ''carcinogen''? I understand the idea you're trying to support (the same one seen in the article on the Pill) but that seems a little excessive. Citation or clarification is ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Estrogen is a ''carcinogen''? I understand the idea you're trying to support (the same one seen in the article on the Pill) but that seems a little excessive. Citation or clarification is needed. In the meanwhile, because estrogen, by itself, does not cause cancer any more than testosterone or any other hormone, I will remove it from the list. [[User:NTemple|NTemple]] 22.45 16 December 2008 (EST) | Estrogen is a ''carcinogen''? I understand the idea you're trying to support (the same one seen in the article on the Pill) but that seems a little excessive. Citation or clarification is needed. In the meanwhile, because estrogen, by itself, does not cause cancer any more than testosterone or any other hormone, I will remove it from the list. [[User:NTemple|NTemple]] 22.45 16 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, only one particular nickel-containing compound has a correlation (which does ''not'' prove causation) with cancer. I'll remove that one too. [[User:NTemple|NTemple]] | ||
Revision as of 03:50, December 17, 2008
Estrogen is a carcinogen? I understand the idea you're trying to support (the same one seen in the article on the Pill) but that seems a little excessive. Citation or clarification is needed. In the meanwhile, because estrogen, by itself, does not cause cancer any more than testosterone or any other hormone, I will remove it from the list. NTemple 22.45 16 December 2008 (EST)
Also, only one particular nickel-containing compound has a correlation (which does not prove causation) with cancer. I'll remove that one too. NTemple