Difference between revisions of "Talk:Escape From Intimacy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The stuff I removed was copied word for word from the first page Scheaf's book, formatted to look different and without proper citing. I thought it better to remove this straight away since it is essentially plagiarism. I have reinserted the material as a direct quote.--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 15:18, 2 December 2008 (EST)
 
The stuff I removed was copied word for word from the first page Scheaf's book, formatted to look different and without proper citing. I thought it better to remove this straight away since it is essentially plagiarism. I have reinserted the material as a direct quote.--[[User:JohnD|JohnD]] 15:18, 2 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:Thanks.  On my edit summary, an accidental ! showed up, not sure why.  I didn't disagree with you, just thought it should be discussed at the talk page before that much of the article was deleted.  This looks great, thanks for your work on it. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 15:41, 2 December 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 20:41, December 2, 2008

Copied material

The stuff I removed was copied word for word from the first page Scheaf's book, formatted to look different and without proper citing. I thought it better to remove this straight away since it is essentially plagiarism. I have reinserted the material as a direct quote.--JohnD 15:18, 2 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks. On my edit summary, an accidental ! showed up, not sure why. I didn't disagree with you, just thought it should be discussed at the talk page before that much of the article was deleted. This looks great, thanks for your work on it. -DrSandstone 15:41, 2 December 2008 (EST)