Difference between revisions of "Talk:Science is a Sacred Cow"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I meant, "Less is more") |
(++actions taken in response to your concerns ++in agreement with Anthony Standen addition) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article has too much fluff. I bet most of the info is identical to what reader could find at any bookselling website like Amazon. Can you boil it down to its essence? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:12, 2 December 2008 (EST) | This article has too much fluff. I bet most of the info is identical to what reader could find at any bookselling website like Amazon. Can you boil it down to its essence? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:12, 2 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | *My transforming the list of review citations to a ref and stating that the book was widely reviewed is an attempt to make the article more encyclopedic and less like something one would find at Amazon. --[[User:RickD|RickD]] 11:37, 2 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:37, December 2, 2008
This article has too much fluff. I bet most of the info is identical to what reader could find at any bookselling website like Amazon. Can you boil it down to its essence? --Ed Poor Talk 11:12, 2 December 2008 (EST)
- My transforming the list of review citations to a ref and stating that the book was widely reviewed is an attempt to make the article more encyclopedic and less like something one would find at Amazon. --RickD 11:37, 2 December 2008 (EST)