Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:AFD Evolutionism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I say restore the article and put a AFD banner on it while the decision is being made, that way people can see what the article says. --~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I say restore the article and put a AFD banner on it while the decision is being made, that way people can see what the article says. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 01:28, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I say restore the article and put a AFD banner on it while the decision is being made, that way people can see what the article says. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 01:28, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I know of no scientist that supports evolution to believe it as a religion.  Infact most of the scientist are either non-religious or are Christian that support it.  To make the claim that evolution is a religion is just false and the article should be removed, unless someone can provide a source for a "church of evolution".--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 10:07, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:07, March 22, 2007

I say restore the article and put a AFD banner on it while the decision is being made, that way people can see what the article says. --Ymmotrojam 01:28, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

I know of no scientist that supports evolution to believe it as a religion. Infact most of the scientist are either non-religious or are Christian that support it. To make the claim that evolution is a religion is just false and the article should be removed, unless someone can provide a source for a "church of evolution".--TimS 10:07, 22 March 2007 (EDT)