Difference between revisions of "Journalistic malpractice"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(added bad news)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
==Journalism and Iraq==
 
==Journalism and Iraq==
 
There were many instances of corruption within this elite group of journalists.  
 
There were many instances of corruption within this elite group of journalists.  
 +
 
===Good News===
 
===Good News===
 
Howard Kurtz of [[CNN]] accurately pointed out on "Reliable Sources," few media outlets seemed at all interested in giving much attention to the great news out of Iraq last week regarding September's sharp decline in casualties. <ref>[http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/07/journalists-tell-howard-kurtz-why-good-news-iraq-shouldn-t-get-report ‘Journalists’ Tell Howard Kurtz Why Good News from Iraq Shouldn’t Get Reported] NewsBusters, October 7, 2007</ref>
 
Howard Kurtz of [[CNN]] accurately pointed out on "Reliable Sources," few media outlets seemed at all interested in giving much attention to the great news out of Iraq last week regarding September's sharp decline in casualties. <ref>[http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/07/journalists-tell-howard-kurtz-why-good-news-iraq-shouldn-t-get-report ‘Journalists’ Tell Howard Kurtz Why Good News from Iraq Shouldn’t Get Reported] NewsBusters, October 7, 2007</ref>
 +
 
===Bad News===
 
===Bad News===
 +
In 2005, Sabrina Tavernise of the NYT's tries her very hardest to cast the future of Iraq as a lost cause. <ref>[http://newsbusters.org/node/5434 NYT: Iraq Middle Class 'Stalked by Death,' Initiating 'Exodus'] NewsBusters, May 19, 2006</ref>
 +
 
===Fake News===
 
===Fake News===
  
Line 23: Line 27:
 
[[Category:Politics]]
 
[[Category:Politics]]
 
[[Category:Deceit]]
 
[[Category:Deceit]]
−
[[Category:Journalism]]
+
[[Category:Journalism]

Revision as of 02:18, November 19, 2008

Journalistic malpractice is a term used to describe the once objective field of journalism which has now been reduced to ideology and slander. It is attributed to people within the mainstream media and old-media, but not exclusively. Their failure as a group willfully misleads and corrupts the public. Objective journalism was once the cornerstone of America's democracy. When objectivity is replaced with malpractice then the media loses credibility. Without credibility, journalism becomes error-filled, journalistic failure, reckless journalism, outright factual inaccuracies, promotion of fact-free journalism or falsehood-spreading. One of journalists' goals is to selectively edit statements to hide facts [1] or to perpetrate falsehoods [2] or hide unflattering stories of like-minded individuals. [3] [4] Another is to repeat falsehoods so that an issue dear to their agenda is kept alive in the publics' mind.[5] Another unethical tactic is to report "off the record" statements in a deception of the journalist's sources and interviewees. Most famously, Connie Chung interviewed Newt Gingrich's parents and solicited Gingrich's mother to repeat an insult he said in private about Hillary Clinton. Chung plied the information from Mrs. Gingrich with the lie: "Why don't you just whisper it to me? Just between you and me", falsely implying that she had no intent to repeat or broadcast the comment.[6]

Journalist comments

Michael Hastings, formerly of Newsweek, had an assignment to write behind-the-scenes stories for Newsweek about the presidential campaigns. He admits upfront that "objectivity is just a fallacy for reporters." [7]

Journalism and Iraq

There were many instances of corruption within this elite group of journalists.

Good News

Howard Kurtz of CNN accurately pointed out on "Reliable Sources," few media outlets seemed at all interested in giving much attention to the great news out of Iraq last week regarding September's sharp decline in casualties. [8]

Bad News

In 2005, Sabrina Tavernise of the NYT's tries her very hardest to cast the future of Iraq as a lost cause. [9]

Fake News

Documented video

References

[[Category:Journalism]