Difference between revisions of "Talk:World History Lecture Three"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Why last para removed) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Confucianism isn't a religion. [[User:DukeAra|DukeAra]] 06:26, 29 February 2008 (EST) | Confucianism isn't a religion. [[User:DukeAra|DukeAra]] 06:26, 29 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've deleted the very last paragraph as it was mostly incorrect. 1. Christianity may indeed be spread by freedom of speech nowadays but that was very much not the case for almost the entire history of the religion, from 330 to about 1750 AD. 2. Evangelism of Sikhism and Buddhism was almost entirely peaceful, much more so than Christianity. 3. Conversion by force is not accepted by Islamic law. [[User:HSpalding|HSpalding]] 20:05, 14 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:05, November 15, 2008
| ! | Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism. Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop. |
|
Bombay doesn't exist any more - it's Mumbai. --Clearlytim 02:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- that's great, this isn't a article. Geo. 02:35, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
This requires learning about many new religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism.
Confucianism isn't a religion. DukeAra 06:26, 29 February 2008 (EST)
I've deleted the very last paragraph as it was mostly incorrect. 1. Christianity may indeed be spread by freedom of speech nowadays but that was very much not the case for almost the entire history of the religion, from 330 to about 1750 AD. 2. Evangelism of Sikhism and Buddhism was almost entirely peaceful, much more so than Christianity. 3. Conversion by force is not accepted by Islamic law. HSpalding 20:05, 14 November 2008 (EST)