Difference between revisions of "Creationism"
Ymmotrojam (talk | contribs) |
TimSvendsen (talk | contribs) (→Creationist categories: old earth) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There are multiple different overarching categories and subcategories within the realm of Creationism, this list is not meant to be exhaustive but to deal with only the notable ones. | There are multiple different overarching categories and subcategories within the realm of Creationism, this list is not meant to be exhaustive but to deal with only the notable ones. | ||
*Biblical [[Young Earth Creationism|Young Earth Creationists]] generally accept a literal or nearly literal interpretation of Genesis and insist that the world is around 6000 years old. Traditionally, Judaism supported young earth creationism. [http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i2/tradition.asp] In addition, a majority of the early [[church fathers]] supported the young earth creationist view.<ref>[http://www.robibrad.demon.co.uk/Chapter3.htm]</ref> | *Biblical [[Young Earth Creationism|Young Earth Creationists]] generally accept a literal or nearly literal interpretation of Genesis and insist that the world is around 6000 years old. Traditionally, Judaism supported young earth creationism. [http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i2/tradition.asp] In addition, a majority of the early [[church fathers]] supported the young earth creationist view.<ref>[http://www.robibrad.demon.co.uk/Chapter3.htm]</ref> | ||
| − | * | + | *[[Old Earth Creationism|Old Earth Creationists]] do not take the bible literaly, and agree with the theory that the age of the earth is around 4.5 billion years but generally do not accept the theory that all life on earth evolved from a common ancestor. Old Earth Creationists generally interpret the Bible by suggesting that the days in Genesis were not 24 hour days or by inserting gaps between various verses in the Bible, in oreder to make it fit with their belief about the age of the earth. There is no general agreement among Old Earth Creationists on whether or not there was a global flood. |
*[[Theistic Evolution]] is the belief that God created the universe and did not intervene directly in the evolutionary process. In general, theistic evolutionist accepts the age of the earth and common descent. Theistic evolutionists believe that at some point God intervened in a metaphysical fashion to give souls to some small group of human ancestors. The Catholic Church holds that this is consistent with the Catholic faith.<ref>[http://www.catholic.net/RCC/Periodicals/Dossier/0102-97/Article3.html Mark Brumley, Evolution and the Pope]</ref> | *[[Theistic Evolution]] is the belief that God created the universe and did not intervene directly in the evolutionary process. In general, theistic evolutionist accepts the age of the earth and common descent. Theistic evolutionists believe that at some point God intervened in a metaphysical fashion to give souls to some small group of human ancestors. The Catholic Church holds that this is consistent with the Catholic faith.<ref>[http://www.catholic.net/RCC/Periodicals/Dossier/0102-97/Article3.html Mark Brumley, Evolution and the Pope]</ref> | ||
Revision as of 20:57, March 21, 2007
Creationism, as opposed to Evolutionism, is the doctrine that matter and all things were created, substantially as they now exist, by an omnipotent Creator, and not gradually evolved or developed.[1] Therefore those that hold the views of Creationism are referred to as Creationists.[2] Most generally, creationism is the belief that the universe was originally created by God.[3]. Creationism can also mean a belief in a creation according to a literal interpretation of the creation stories in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. Creationism in and of itself is not science, but a question of faith. Some forms of creationism (especially the more literal forms) conflict with evolution while others do not.[4] Not all Christian denominations embrace creationism with the more literal Genesis interpretations. Many non-Christian sects believe in a form of creationism, including American Indian religions, Hindus, and the Classical Greek and Egyptian polytheistic religions.
Creationist categories
There are multiple different overarching categories and subcategories within the realm of Creationism, this list is not meant to be exhaustive but to deal with only the notable ones.
- Biblical Young Earth Creationists generally accept a literal or nearly literal interpretation of Genesis and insist that the world is around 6000 years old. Traditionally, Judaism supported young earth creationism. [5] In addition, a majority of the early church fathers supported the young earth creationist view.[3]
- Old Earth Creationists do not take the bible literaly, and agree with the theory that the age of the earth is around 4.5 billion years but generally do not accept the theory that all life on earth evolved from a common ancestor. Old Earth Creationists generally interpret the Bible by suggesting that the days in Genesis were not 24 hour days or by inserting gaps between various verses in the Bible, in oreder to make it fit with their belief about the age of the earth. There is no general agreement among Old Earth Creationists on whether or not there was a global flood.
- Theistic Evolution is the belief that God created the universe and did not intervene directly in the evolutionary process. In general, theistic evolutionist accepts the age of the earth and common descent. Theistic evolutionists believe that at some point God intervened in a metaphysical fashion to give souls to some small group of human ancestors. The Catholic Church holds that this is consistent with the Catholic faith.[4]
Controversy
Creationism and Intelligent Design
It is unclear if Intelligent Design amounts to a form of creationism and if so, where to place it in comparison to the other forms of creationism. This is due to the concept having many different definitions and proponents espousing different ideas.
For example, one major proponent of Intelligent Design is Paul Nelson who a Young Earth Creationist, while Michael Behe, another major proponent, accepts common descent. William Dembski has stated unequivocally that Intelligent Design is not theistic evolution and they should not be considered the same[5]. Dembski has also asserted that Intelligent Design is the Logos in terms of information theory[6], while Dembski and others have given other definitions that do not include any specific theological references. Arguably, intelligent design can be summarized as the notion that at some point in the past, in some way, some entity(possibly God) created life, or altered life at some point, or created the universe to be compatable with life.
Behe and others have stated that Intelligent Design is not religious in nature but in the Dover trial, Judge John E. Jones III, a Republican and a US Federal District Judge, ruled as a one of his findings that Intelligent Design was essentially religious in nature. The opinion met with wide accolades, but some criticism that it borrowed too heavily from the ACLU's briefs. [6] Nonetheless, it has been embraced by the legal community, and has quickly become the subject of renewed scholarship on the scope of the First Amendment.[7]
Offensive Terminology
Some Young Earth Creationists say that the term Creationism is simply a false atheistic, Evolutionist perception, or pejorative assertion that believing in a God means that all science and intellectual thinking has to be left behind. They say that the perception finds no grounding in reality, other than as a rhetorical dramatization.
See also
External links
Young Earth Creationist Organizations
- Answers In Genesis - Get Answers
- Creation Ministries International
- Institute for Creation Research
- TrueOrigins.org
- Center for Scientific Creation
- CreationWiki - Although not completely Young Earth, CreationWiki is a mainly Young Earth Creationist Wiki.
Old Earth Creationists
Reasons To Believe, an Old Earth Creationist Ministry
References and Footnotes
- ↑ "creationism." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 21 Mar. 2007. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creationism>.
- ↑ "creationist." Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 21 Mar. 2007. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creationist>.
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ Mark Brumley, Evolution and the Pope
- ↑ What every theologian should know about creation, evolution, and design Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Transactions 3(2), William Demsbki
- ↑ [2] Signs of Intelligence: A Primer on the Discernment of Intelligent Design Touchstone Magazine, Volume 12, Issue 4 July-August 1999
- ↑ Richard B. Katskee, "Religion in Public Schools," 5 First Amend. L. Rev. 112 (2006)