Difference between revisions of "Talk:Berlin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I was being sarcastic. And that comment still stands. Berlin has a long and interesting history as a town a city and a seat of power. There should be an article to reflect this; not just the cold war partition and modern irrelevancies. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 13:53, 26 October 2008 (EDT) | I was being sarcastic. And that comment still stands. Berlin has a long and interesting history as a town a city and a seat of power. There should be an article to reflect this; not just the cold war partition and modern irrelevancies. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 13:53, 26 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Why not write one? You have been dissatisfied with this one for 17 long months. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:57, 26 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:57, October 26, 2008
The first sentence is useful. It tells readers that Berlin existed before the late 1940's.AlanE 01:19, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Erm, Berlin has been around since the early 13th century! (anyone knows that it is an old town, i mean look at the brandenburg gate, that was built before the napoleonic wars (late 18th-early 19th centuries A.D.)--PhilipV
I was being sarcastic. And that comment still stands. Berlin has a long and interesting history as a town a city and a seat of power. There should be an article to reflect this; not just the cold war partition and modern irrelevancies. AlanE 13:53, 26 October 2008 (EDT)
- Why not write one? You have been dissatisfied with this one for 17 long months. Bugler 13:57, 26 October 2008 (EDT)