Difference between revisions of "Talk:Internet parodist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Standards) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Is this not perhaps because so much of Liberal ideology is beyond parody? In the words of the Conservative British commentator Richard Littlejohn, "You couldn't make it up". [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:50, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | Is this not perhaps because so much of Liberal ideology is beyond parody? In the words of the Conservative British commentator Richard Littlejohn, "You couldn't make it up". [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 04:50, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
: I would assume that it's because conservatives have standards than discourage them from deceiving. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:04, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | : I would assume that it's because conservatives have standards than discourage them from deceiving. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:04, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. [[User:MichaelFAnderson|MichaelFAnderson]] 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:08, October 24, 2008
'One simply does not find conservative parodists on liberal forums, and one wonders if perhaps that fact may reflect on the psychological underpinnings of the liberal point of view.'
Is this not perhaps because so much of Liberal ideology is beyond parody? In the words of the Conservative British commentator Richard Littlejohn, "You couldn't make it up". Bugler 04:50, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- I would assume that it's because conservatives have standards than discourage them from deceiving. Philip J. Rayment 05:04, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- I am a rotten liberal, atheist but I still feel that I basically agree with the gist of this article. I feel that it is perfectly legitimate to edit or debate or even to use humor or sarcasm on Conservapedia but I think to disguise yourself as a parodists or to be a vandal is pretty unproductive. MichaelFAnderson 10:08, 24 October 2008 (EDT)