Difference between revisions of "American History Homework Five Answers - Model"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(first model answer added)
(graded)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
(e) He could have lived in the State of California.<br><br>
 
(e) He could have lived in the State of California.<br><br>
 
2.  Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.
 
2.  Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.
−
<br><br>
+
 
 +
:They wanted a national bank and they did not want to annex Texas. Basically everything the Democrats were against, the Whigs wanted. (Steve M.)
 +
 
 
3.  What caused and what ended the Mexican War?
 
3.  What caused and what ended the Mexican War?
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
Line 21: Line 23:
 
7.  Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War?  Explain.
 
7.  Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War?  Explain.
  
−
No, The Civil War was absolutely unavoidable. Slavery was an extremely important issue to many people, whether they were for or against it. Nearly each individual had their own opinion and was ready defend that opinion. The American population was almost evenly split over the slavery issue - a country cannot survive divided, because if a country is divided, they are weak and susceptible to war from other stronger countries. So, war took place - no agreement could be reached to satisfy both sides of the issue. The only way to settle this dispute was through war. The Civil War lasted 4 years; but its monumental impact on America lasts even today. (Bethany S.)
+
:No, The Civil War was absolutely unavoidable. Slavery was an extremely important issue to many people, whether they were for or against it. Nearly each individual had their own opinion and was ready defend that opinion. The American population was almost evenly split over the slavery issue - a country cannot survive divided, because if a country is divided, they are weak and susceptible to war from other stronger countries. So, war took place - no agreement could be reached to satisfy both sides of the issue. The only way to settle this dispute was through war. The Civil War lasted 4 years; but its monumental impact on America lasts even today. (Bethany S.)
  
 
== Honors Questions ==
 
== Honors Questions ==
Line 32: Line 34:
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
H3. Explain how "Freeport Doctrine" cost Douglas support in the presidential election of 1860.
 
H3. Explain how "Freeport Doctrine" cost Douglas support in the presidential election of 1860.
−
<br><br>
+
 
 +
:Lincoln was clever. He made Douglas define his ideas, including Popular Sovereignty. Douglas had to specify that ''if'' a state voted to abolish slavery, they could abolish it, even a slave state. At that point the slave holders began to think that the Missouri Compromise was not such a bad idea after all. At least with that, they were guaranteed to be able to own slaves below the 34 30' line. With the Freeport Doctrine there was no sure thing, every state was different. (Steve M.)
 +
 
 
H4. Do you think John Brown helped his cause?
 
H4. Do you think John Brown helped his cause?
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
 
H5. Explain how the ''Dred Scott'' decision was similar to judicial activism today, such as ''Roe v. Wade''.
 
H5. Explain how the ''Dred Scott'' decision was similar to judicial activism today, such as ''Roe v. Wade''.

Revision as of 22:06, October 16, 2008

Lecture - Questions - Student Answers

1. Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858. Imagine also that he belonged to the "Know Nothing Party." The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:

Spanking politician.jpg

(a) He knew nothing about airplanes and automobiles.
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.
(c) He belonged to a relatively new political party.
(d) He was probably not a member of the Republican Party.
(e) He could have lived in the State of California.

2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.

They wanted a national bank and they did not want to annex Texas. Basically everything the Democrats were against, the Whigs wanted. (Steve M.)

3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War?

4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why?

5. Explain what "Bleeding Kansas" was.

6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, "You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ...."

7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain.

No, The Civil War was absolutely unavoidable. Slavery was an extremely important issue to many people, whether they were for or against it. Nearly each individual had their own opinion and was ready defend that opinion. The American population was almost evenly split over the slavery issue - a country cannot survive divided, because if a country is divided, they are weak and susceptible to war from other stronger countries. So, war took place - no agreement could be reached to satisfy both sides of the issue. The only way to settle this dispute was through war. The Civil War lasted 4 years; but its monumental impact on America lasts even today. (Bethany S.)

Honors Questions

These questions require answers that are a bit longer than the answers above. Answer three out of the following questions (in addition to the questions above):

H1. Discuss any of the debate issues or mysteries relating to 1840-1860.

H2. Explain the Compromise of 1850.

H3. Explain how "Freeport Doctrine" cost Douglas support in the presidential election of 1860.

Lincoln was clever. He made Douglas define his ideas, including Popular Sovereignty. Douglas had to specify that if a state voted to abolish slavery, they could abolish it, even a slave state. At that point the slave holders began to think that the Missouri Compromise was not such a bad idea after all. At least with that, they were guaranteed to be able to own slaves below the 34 30' line. With the Freeport Doctrine there was no sure thing, every state was different. (Steve M.)

H4. Do you think John Brown helped his cause?

H5. Explain how the Dred Scott decision was similar to judicial activism today, such as Roe v. Wade.