Difference between revisions of "User:HelpJazz"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (didn't update both numbers)
(aw man I forgot to save)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
{{userboxbottom}}
 
{{userboxbottom}}
 
[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|right|'''HelpJazz''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar  for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!]]
 
[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|right|'''HelpJazz''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar  for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!]]
−
 
−
<Big>'''My Editing Philosophy'''</big>
 
−
*Noncontroversial edits are ''usually'' ok
 
−
*I will always follow the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]] and [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]]
 
−
*I won't change work from the editors who are never wrong, unless I really, really, really know what I am doing
 
−
*I won't edit or comment on essay pages; they are supposed to be opinion
 
−
**Corollary 1: I will petition for mainspace opinion pieces to be moved to the essay space
 
−
**Corollary 2: I will realize that certain main space opinion pieces... won't be moved to the essay space
 
−
*I will point out and correct when an article is unencyclopedic, but will back down when defending my action is futile
 
−
*I will point out and correct when an article does not follow the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]] or [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]], but will back down when defending my action is futile
 
−
*I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
 
−
*I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words
 
−
*There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people
 
−
*I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself)
 
−
*I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
 
−
*I will never block someone for violating the [[90/10 rule]]
 
−
*I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
 
−
*I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
 
−
*I will never block someone for referring to or showing up on That Which Shall Not Be Named (and no, I can't tell you what it is, and no, I can not give you any hints)
 
−
*If a block is properly given, then no apology should ever be needed as an unblocking condition
 
−
*I will not unblock myself if blocked by a sysop
 
−
 
−
Some who think they are more rational than me may say that I'm a wimp for backing down. I say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result.
 
  
 
<big>'''About Me'''</big>
 
<big>'''About Me'''</big>
Line 37: Line 14:
 
*I (still) support [[Ron Paul]] for Republican Presidential nominee
 
*I (still) support [[Ron Paul]] for Republican Presidential nominee
 
**I'm currently undecided as to whom I will vote for, but I will never vote for [[Obama]], [[Nader]], any [[Green Party]] candidate, or any [[left-wing]] candidates  (aka Socialist party and those other wingnuts). The only wingnut I might vote for is [[Bob Barr]], but from what little I know about him, he's kind of a "blah" candidate.
 
**I'm currently undecided as to whom I will vote for, but I will never vote for [[Obama]], [[Nader]], any [[Green Party]] candidate, or any [[left-wing]] candidates  (aka Socialist party and those other wingnuts). The only wingnut I might vote for is [[Bob Barr]], but from what little I know about him, he's kind of a "blah" candidate.
−
*In 2008 I graduated from [[Bucknell University]] with a [[bachelor of science]] degree in [[chemical engineering]]
+
*In 2008 I graduated from [[Bucknell University]] with a [[bachelor of science]] degree in [[chemical engineering]]. No job yet though... :(
 
**I have a pretty strong background in fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, [[thermodynamics]], etc. etc.
 
**I have a pretty strong background in fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, [[thermodynamics]], etc. etc.
 
**I was at one point pursuing a minor in [[political science]]
 
**I was at one point pursuing a minor in [[political science]]
 
***I have a good working base of political science, political theory and [[international politics]]
 
***I have a good working base of political science, political theory and [[international politics]]
 
**I also have taken courses in [[economics]], [[logic]], and [[probability]]
 
**I also have taken courses in [[economics]], [[logic]], and [[probability]]
 +
 +
<Big>'''My Editing Philosophy'''</big>
 +
#Noncontroversial edits are ''usually'' ok
 +
#I will always follow the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|Guidelines]] and [[Conservapedia:Commandments|Commandments]] (G&C)
 +
#I will attempt to make all articles follow the G&C, and encourage other editors to do likewise
 +
#Essay pages are opinion
 +
#Mainspace pages are fact
 +
#''No [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Aziraphale/Tilting_at_Windmills&oldid=296120 tilting at windmills]!
 +
#I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
 +
#I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words
 +
 +
<big>'''My Blocking Philospophy'''</big>
 +
#There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people
 +
#I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself)
 +
#I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
 +
#I will never block someone for violating the [[90/10 rule]]
 +
#I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
 +
#I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
 +
#I will never block someone for referring to or showing up on That Which Shall Not Be Named (and no, I can't tell you what it is, and no, I can not give you any hints)
 +
#If a block is properly given, then no apology should ever be needed as an unblocking condition
 +
#I will not unblock myself if blocked by a sysop, or someone I respect
 +
#I will not undo a block, unless the user was blocked by a vandal
 +
 +
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result.
  
 
<small>Subs: [[/chemredlinks]], [[/Contest]], [[/refs]], [[/workspace]], [[/chemeng]], [[/templates]], [[/irg]]
 
<small>Subs: [[/chemredlinks]], [[/Contest]], [[/refs]], [[/workspace]], [[/chemeng]], [[/templates]], [[/irg]]

Revision as of 05:56, October 5, 2008

HelpJazz
5,000 This user has made over 5,000 edits to Conservapedia
Forever Stamp.jpg This user is a libertarian.
•
PolCompass.gif
This user's Political Compass coordinates are 5.00,-2.92.
CivicCrown.jpg
This user supports an autonomous collective as the rightful leader of Conservapedia.
HelpJazz is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted Banhammer barnstar for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!

About Me

  • I am a libertarian, and very much so!
    • Actually, I'm a social and economic conservative. The difference between me and most conservatives is not what I believe, but where I think the government should step in for my beliefs.
    • Feel free to ask me about my positions. I love talking politics with open-minded, rational people
  • I (still) support Ron Paul for Republican Presidential nominee
    • I'm currently undecided as to whom I will vote for, but I will never vote for Obama, Nader, any Green Party candidate, or any left-wing candidates (aka Socialist party and those other wingnuts). The only wingnut I might vote for is Bob Barr, but from what little I know about him, he's kind of a "blah" candidate.
  • In 2008 I graduated from Bucknell University with a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering. No job yet though... :(

My Editing Philosophy

  1. Noncontroversial edits are usually ok
  2. I will always follow the Guidelines and Commandments (G&C)
  3. I will attempt to make all articles follow the G&C, and encourage other editors to do likewise
  4. Essay pages are opinion
  5. Mainspace pages are fact
  6. No tilting at windmills!
  7. I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
  8. I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words

My Blocking Philospophy

  1. There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people
  2. I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself)
  3. I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
  4. I will never block someone for violating the 90/10 rule
  5. I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
  6. I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
  7. I will never block someone for referring to or showing up on That Which Shall Not Be Named (and no, I can't tell you what it is, and no, I can not give you any hints)
  8. If a block is properly given, then no apology should ever be needed as an unblocking condition
  9. I will not unblock myself if blocked by a sysop, or someone I respect
  10. I will not undo a block, unless the user was blocked by a vandal

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result.

Subs: /chemredlinks, /Contest, /refs, /workspace, /chemeng, /templates, /irg