Difference between revisions of "Talk:Useful idiot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: It's kind of funny but an atheist like Sam Harris would probably consider the example of the churchians to be sort of "Useless Idiots" in that he thinks their liberal attitudes towards rel...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's kind of funny but an atheist like Sam Harris would probably consider the example of the churchians to be sort of "Useless Idiots" in that he thinks their liberal attitudes towards religious tolerance gives cover to the ultra-conservative religous. [[User:MickA|MickA]] 12:32, 24 September 2008 (EDT) | It's kind of funny but an atheist like Sam Harris would probably consider the example of the churchians to be sort of "Useless Idiots" in that he thinks their liberal attitudes towards religious tolerance gives cover to the ultra-conservative religous. [[User:MickA|MickA]] 12:32, 24 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is "churchian" a sort of jargon used when it would be distasteful to call someone a "Christian"? [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 17:45, 24 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:45, September 24, 2008
It's kind of funny but an atheist like Sam Harris would probably consider the example of the churchians to be sort of "Useless Idiots" in that he thinks their liberal attitudes towards religious tolerance gives cover to the ultra-conservative religous. MickA 12:32, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Is "churchian" a sort of jargon used when it would be distasteful to call someone a "Christian"? Fishal 17:45, 24 September 2008 (EDT)