Difference between revisions of "Talk:Clarence Thomas"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
::Nonetheless, the allegations show just how far liberals will go to prevent a conservative from sitting on the Supreme Court. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 19:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::Nonetheless, the allegations show just how far liberals will go to prevent a conservative from sitting on the Supreme Court. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 19:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:How were the allegations at all related to being liberal or conservative? --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 19:37, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:37, September 20, 2008

Edited to remove opinion and speculation with no factual evidence cited to support it. Britinme 6:34pm 2 April 2007 (EDT)

Sexual Allegations

I just thought I would add the case which made Clarence Thomas famous to the article. I don't know why it wasn't there, after all, this is supposed to be the trustworthy encyclopedia. JSJames 2:00pm (PT) 20 Septmeber 2008

In my opinion, the Hill allegations were disproved. I would object to including allegations like this unless, at a minimum, the article includes the reasons for thinking that she way lying. RSchlafly 18:47, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
Nonetheless, the allegations show just how far liberals will go to prevent a conservative from sitting on the Supreme Court. Jinxmchue 19:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
How were the allegations at all related to being liberal or conservative? --AndrasK 19:37, 20 September 2008 (EDT)