Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Big science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Rename or something: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This <s>essay</s> article needs a whole heck of a lot more references than the, uh, zero that it currently contains. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:12, 17 September 2008 (EDT) | This <s>essay</s> article needs a whole heck of a lot more references than the, uh, zero that it currently contains. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:12, 17 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
:"The aim of furthering 'world government' and the overthrow of national sovereignty"? This is pushing paranoia and hysteria to new levels of credulity. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 14:48, 17 September 2008 (EDT) | :"The aim of furthering 'world government' and the overthrow of national sovereignty"? This is pushing paranoia and hysteria to new levels of credulity. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 14:48, 17 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Rename or something == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suggest this article be deleted (since it was created to prove a point), moved to essay, or at least renamed. The term "Big science" is already defined. Please read the Britannica article on the subject for its definition and the history of the phrase. We can't just redefine established terms. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 11:53, 18 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:53, September 18, 2008
This essay article needs a whole heck of a lot more references than the, uh, zero that it currently contains. HelpJazz 13:12, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
- "The aim of furthering 'world government' and the overthrow of national sovereignty"? This is pushing paranoia and hysteria to new levels of credulity. Sideways 14:48, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
Rename or something
I suggest this article be deleted (since it was created to prove a point), moved to essay, or at least renamed. The term "Big science" is already defined. Please read the Britannica article on the subject for its definition and the history of the phrase. We can't just redefine established terms. HenryS 11:53, 18 September 2008 (EDT)