Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bipolar disorder"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I can't state my case any clearer. Anything that is defined as a mystery (by Andy himself, Bugler, since you seem to make edits on his behalf) ''by definition'' can't be included in an encyclopedia article. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:53, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | I can't state my case any clearer. Anything that is defined as a mystery (by Andy himself, Bugler, since you seem to make edits on his behalf) ''by definition'' can't be included in an encyclopedia article. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:53, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :That part is out. Its listed as an external link. What are the other issues? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 17:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:00, September 16, 2008
Source
Source is a redirect that doesn't redirect. I think the claim that Bipolar disorder is linked to socialism/liberalism in a backhanded way deserves a citation. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 17:55, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
- See the link at the bottom of that section. Bugler 18:00, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
- The "See Also" or the external link? The external link is the one that I'm talking about. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 18:06, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
- The wikilink makes no mention of bipolar disorder. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 18:12, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
Edit war
F.A.O. Bugler. Your edit summary said "do not edit war". I'm not sure who this is addressed to, but my own contributions regarding the treatment of BPD & famous sufferers were factual & encyclopedic, & addressed an area not previously covered in the text. You have deleted these twice without explanation, so I am now going to restore my version of the text. Please heed your own advice and do not edit war. If you have a problem with my contributions, please discuss it here.
As for your suggestion that BPD is caused by environmental conditioning &/or socialism, please provide a citation for this, preferably from a respected scientific source, or some statistics, as it contradicts the general consensus that it is a largely genetic disorder. Thank you. Sideways 16:21, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you to HelpJazz for reverting. I was about to do it myself. Sideways 16:22, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
I can't state my case any clearer. Anything that is defined as a mystery (by Andy himself, Bugler, since you seem to make edits on his behalf) by definition can't be included in an encyclopedia article. HelpJazz 16:53, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
- That part is out. Its listed as an external link. What are the other issues? HenryS 17:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT)