Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bipolar disorder"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Source is a redirect that doesn't redirect.  I think the claim that Bipolar disorder is linked to socialism/liberalism in a backhanded way deserves a citation.  [[User:LautRN|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:LautRN|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 17:55, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 
Source is a redirect that doesn't redirect.  I think the claim that Bipolar disorder is linked to socialism/liberalism in a backhanded way deserves a citation.  [[User:LautRN|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:LautRN|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 17:55, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:See the link at the bottom of that section. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 18:00, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:See the link at the bottom of that section. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 18:00, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
::The "See Also" or the external link?  The external link is the one that I'm talking about. [[User:LautRN|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:LautRN|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 18:06, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:06, September 14, 2008

Source

Source is a redirect that doesn't redirect. I think the claim that Bipolar disorder is linked to socialism/liberalism in a backhanded way deserves a citation. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 17:55, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

See the link at the bottom of that section. Bugler 18:00, 14 September 2008 (EDT)
The "See Also" or the external link? The external link is the one that I'm talking about. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 18:06, 14 September 2008 (EDT)