Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal Myths About Education"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
::Undoubtedly.  However, I'd also like to employ sources from outside Conservapedia.  It's too easy for those who support these myths to claim that someone like Andy, who teaches and is an advocate for home-schooled children, is a biased or "unreliable" source.  It's much more difficult to say that when multiple sources from a variety of educational researchers are used.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:33, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::Undoubtedly.  However, I'd also like to employ sources from outside Conservapedia.  It's too easy for those who support these myths to claim that someone like Andy, who teaches and is an advocate for home-schooled children, is a biased or "unreliable" source.  It's much more difficult to say that when multiple sources from a variety of educational researchers are used.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:33, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I am sure I have seen Andy post independent cites before. I'll ask him now. [[User:ClarkeD|ClarkeD]] 20:42, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 00:42, September 10, 2008

The current article lacks citations, but I intend to correct that over the next few days; almost all of the points here are supported by a great deal of research. --Benp 20:28, 9 September 2008 (EDT)

I think Aschlafly knows something about girls/boys and maths ability. ClarkeD 20:29, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Undoubtedly. However, I'd also like to employ sources from outside Conservapedia. It's too easy for those who support these myths to claim that someone like Andy, who teaches and is an advocate for home-schooled children, is a biased or "unreliable" source. It's much more difficult to say that when multiple sources from a variety of educational researchers are used. --Benp 20:33, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
I am sure I have seen Andy post independent cites before. I'll ask him now. ClarkeD 20:42, 9 September 2008 (EDT)