Difference between revisions of "Talk:Species"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:::That is, actually, untrue. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 16:27, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:::That is, actually, untrue. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 16:27, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::::It is, actually, true. A female horse and a male donkey yields a mule. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 19:17, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::::It is, actually, true. A female horse and a male donkey yields a mule. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 19:17, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::Ability to reproduce defines species for the layman. So-called scientists may have a different definition, but they are not welcome here. The layman definition is all a good Christian needs to know, visit Wikipedia for a different one. --[[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 19:28, 2 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:28, September 2, 2008

"A German Shepherd and a Beagle can mate, because they are different breeds within one species. " - There is no such thing a dog, because it's still a wolf? :) NewCrusader 15:53, 2 September 2008 (EDT)

Dogs were created by God, as were wolves. The relation between them is only because God willed it so. JohnI 16:00, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
Tigers and lions are different species, but they can breed. Ability to reproduce does not define species. -DrSandstone 16:08, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
They can, indeed, produce offspring, but such offspring are unable to produce more because they become infertile, same goes with donkeys and horses. JohnI 16:11, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
That is, actually, untrue. -DrSandstone 16:27, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
It is, actually, true. A female horse and a male donkey yields a mule. JohnI 19:17, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
Ability to reproduce defines species for the layman. So-called scientists may have a different definition, but they are not welcome here. The layman definition is all a good Christian needs to know, visit Wikipedia for a different one. --SilvioB 19:28, 2 September 2008 (EDT)