Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skeptics Annotated Bible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Thank you Fox, but the refutation appears to need rewording to suit an encyclopedic style.--[[User:Heffalump|Heffalump]] 19:29, 16 March 2008 (EDT) | Thank you Fox, but the refutation appears to need rewording to suit an encyclopedic style.--[[User:Heffalump|Heffalump]] 19:29, 16 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Feel free to do so. I was just off to put the kettle on, so edited rather hurriedly. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:34, 16 March 2008 (EDT) | :Feel free to do so. I was just off to put the kettle on, so edited rather hurriedly. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 19:34, 16 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The refutation also makes no direct material claims that can be or are sourced...Would it be possible to show a refuted example? --[[User:Ctv|Ctv]] 20:40, 17 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:40, August 18, 2008
refutation
Thank you Fox, but the refutation appears to need rewording to suit an encyclopedic style.--Heffalump 19:29, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
- Feel free to do so. I was just off to put the kettle on, so edited rather hurriedly. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 19:34, 16 March 2008 (EDT)
The refutation also makes no direct material claims that can be or are sourced...Would it be possible to show a refuted example? --Ctv 20:40, 17 August 2008 (EDT)