Difference between revisions of "Talk:Destiny Church"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
--
 
--
  
−
There's some biased information here I've removed - may would disagree the church is well-led.  Even many New Zealand evangelicals see Destiny Church as a 'cult', in part as a result of a perceived emphasis on Prosperity Gospel.[[User:UlyssesNZ|UlyssesNZ]] 20:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
+
There's some biased information here I've removed - many would disagree the church is well-led.  Even many New Zealand evangelicals see Destiny Church as a 'cult', in part as a result of a perceived emphasis on Prosperity Gospel.[[User:UlyssesNZ|UlyssesNZ]] 20:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:17, August 17, 2008

reverted your changes because

It believes in the word of Lord as in the Bible, and although in a country surrounded by blasphemy, social decay and immorality, (New Zealand) serves to protect its standing as a Christian country.

Note that the subject "it" is in the sentence once and to repeat it is bad grammar.

years v year's

I'm not exactly sure why but I think years is better here. --

There's some biased information here I've removed - many would disagree the church is well-led. Even many New Zealand evangelicals see Destiny Church as a 'cult', in part as a result of a perceived emphasis on Prosperity Gospel.UlyssesNZ 20:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT)