Difference between revisions of "User talk:ConcernedModerate"
(New page: What are you concerned about, ConcernedModerate? Judging by your record to date, it isn't making substantive contributions to this project. We already have enough moaners and closet [[Libe...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What are you concerned about, ConcernedModerate? Judging by your record to date, it isn't making substantive contributions to this project. We already have enough moaners and closet [[Liberal]]s, so I look forward to a better attitude and some useful articles from you - then you might enjoy your time here and become a ConfidentConservative. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:04, 30 June 2008 (EDT) | What are you concerned about, ConcernedModerate? Judging by your record to date, it isn't making substantive contributions to this project. We already have enough moaners and closet [[Liberal]]s, so I look forward to a better attitude and some useful articles from you - then you might enjoy your time here and become a ConfidentConservative. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:04, 30 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | To answer your question, my primary concern is with the unneccesary ideological prefaces to at least one news headline I find every time I log on to this site. Conservapedia presents an interesting alternative Wikipedia, but it can never hope to gain the scope and range of support of Wikipedia if blatant bias remains evident in the main page news column. Given the time I can devote to the site, doing my part to mend that serious ill is, in my opinion, a substantive contribution. [[User:ConcernedModerate|ConcernedModerate]] 12:48, 30 June 2008 | ||
Revision as of 17:48, June 30, 2008
What are you concerned about, ConcernedModerate? Judging by your record to date, it isn't making substantive contributions to this project. We already have enough moaners and closet Liberals, so I look forward to a better attitude and some useful articles from you - then you might enjoy your time here and become a ConfidentConservative. Bugler 11:04, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
To answer your question, my primary concern is with the unneccesary ideological prefaces to at least one news headline I find every time I log on to this site. Conservapedia presents an interesting alternative Wikipedia, but it can never hope to gain the scope and range of support of Wikipedia if blatant bias remains evident in the main page news column. Given the time I can devote to the site, doing my part to mend that serious ill is, in my opinion, a substantive contribution. ConcernedModerate 12:48, 30 June 2008