Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pluto"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
===Problems for evolutionary theory===
 
===Problems for evolutionary theory===
 
I am changing the heading for this section, as evolution has absolutely nothing to do with astrophysics.  Evolution is a theory in the field of biology.  If you have a problem, speak up, as I cannot see why this needs to be included if it makes no sense. [[User:Jparenti|Jparenti]] 12:39, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 
I am changing the heading for this section, as evolution has absolutely nothing to do with astrophysics.  Evolution is a theory in the field of biology.  If you have a problem, speak up, as I cannot see why this needs to be included if it makes no sense. [[User:Jparenti|Jparenti]] 12:39, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
I have changed this section again, under the new heading that was created yesterday by another user.  I believe it more accurately reflects the reference already cited in the section.  I disposed of the part that discusses the capture theory, as it is no longer a viable option for Pluto's origin and no one really thinks that's how it happened anymore anyway.  [[User:Jparenti|Jparenti]] 11:15, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:15, June 27, 2008

! This article or part thereof was also submitted to CreationWiki. The submitted text was written by me, TerryH, and submitted to CreationWiki, within seven days of its submission here, under the name Temlakos. It does not include contributions made by others on that site. Conservlogo.png

So what if it's not accountable? Science is most decidedly not a democracy. --John 00:06, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

Problems for evolutionary theory

I am changing the heading for this section, as evolution has absolutely nothing to do with astrophysics. Evolution is a theory in the field of biology. If you have a problem, speak up, as I cannot see why this needs to be included if it makes no sense. Jparenti 12:39, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

I have changed this section again, under the new heading that was created yesterday by another user. I believe it more accurately reflects the reference already cited in the section. I disposed of the part that discusses the capture theory, as it is no longer a viable option for Pluto's origin and no one really thinks that's how it happened anymore anyway. Jparenti 11:15, 27 June 2008 (EDT)