Difference between revisions of "Talk:BBC News"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Republican (talk | contribs) |
Hojimachong (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I am wondering about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_evolution&action=history here] Conservative and myself seem to be in a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative#CP:AID quandry]what do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source? ">[[User:republican|'''republican''']] | I am wondering about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_evolution&action=history here] Conservative and myself seem to be in a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative#CP:AID quandry]what do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source? ">[[User:republican|'''republican''']] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Well, the notion that the oldest, largest, and most well-respected news corporation on earth shouldn't be used as a source is completely ridiculous in any respect. If you can't use BBC, then of course CNN, FOX, Al-Jazeera (no pun intended), MSNBC, ABC News, CSM, etc. wouldn't be authoritative at all. A news Corp. reports ''news''; that is, they report on the finding of other people. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:42, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:42, March 19, 2007
Should the BBC be allowed as a referring source if it allows this sort of contentand this.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by republican (talk)
- ...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --Hojimachongtalk 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
I am wondering about here Conservative and myself seem to be in a quandrywhat do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source? ">republican
- Well, the notion that the oldest, largest, and most well-respected news corporation on earth shouldn't be used as a source is completely ridiculous in any respect. If you can't use BBC, then of course CNN, FOX, Al-Jazeera (no pun intended), MSNBC, ABC News, CSM, etc. wouldn't be authoritative at all. A news Corp. reports news; that is, they report on the finding of other people. --Hojimachongtalk 21:42, 18 March 2007 (EDT)