Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michelle Malkin"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The rest of her archives should be filled in; it looks odd only going up to H. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:43, 20 August 2007 (EDT) | The rest of her archives should be filled in; it looks odd only going up to H. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:43, 20 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Done. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 20:32, 20 August 2007 (EDT) | :Done. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 20:32, 20 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why is this long list of subjects advertising for her on this article, anyway? Isn't this an encyclopedia, and isn't this information a heck of a lot more appropriate on her site, not an article? I removed it, but Jinxmchue added it back in without explanation... maybe you could do so here, Jinx?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 00:59, 8 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:59, June 8, 2008
Michelle Malkin is a very beautiful lady. Between her and Ann Coulter I don't know who I'd ask to do a slow dance with first.--Jedisqrl 23:35, 7 June 2008 (EDT)
Content
This is a funny article...Is Michelle running for class president or what? There is no real info here about her, just a couple of lines about some of her columns. Weak! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spike (talk)
Archives
The rest of her archives should be filled in; it looks odd only going up to H. DanH 19:43, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
- Done. --Crocoite 20:32, 20 August 2007 (EDT)
Why is this long list of subjects advertising for her on this article, anyway? Isn't this an encyclopedia, and isn't this information a heck of a lot more appropriate on her site, not an article? I removed it, but Jinxmchue added it back in without explanation... maybe you could do so here, Jinx?--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 00:59, 8 June 2008 (EDT)