Difference between revisions of "Talk:Order of succession"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Wow. Since August eh? I'm not so sure your take-no-prisoners approach is best, here Danny. Think back on your high school civics class. Presidential Succession Act of 1947: see: [http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/branches/docs/succession.pdf here] | ::Wow. Since August eh? I'm not so sure your take-no-prisoners approach is best, here Danny. Think back on your high school civics class. Presidential Succession Act of 1947: see: [http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/branches/docs/succession.pdf here] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Feel free to put it back. Since he had so many contributions, I didn't really have the time to research each and every unreverted edit. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:19, 6 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:19, June 7, 2008
why remove the bit about the Presidential Succession Act of 1947? AliceBG 22:58, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- This user inserted false information into a bunch of articles. I don't know what's real and what's not, so I'm playing it safe reverting everything. I'm not sure that he ever contributed anything true. DanH 22:59, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- Wow. Since August eh? I'm not so sure your take-no-prisoners approach is best, here Danny. Think back on your high school civics class. Presidential Succession Act of 1947: see: here
Feel free to put it back. Since he had so many contributions, I didn't really have the time to research each and every unreverted edit. DanH 23:19, 6 June 2008 (EDT)