Difference between revisions of "Atheism and evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Atheism and Debate|Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates]] and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the [[United States]]. | [[Atheism and Debate|Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates]] and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the [[United States]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Darwinian evolutionary theory]], at least in the mind of John Q. Public, is the number one argument for [[atheism]]. [http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/18/evolution-101/] | ||
| + | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[Atheism]] | *[[Atheism]] | ||
Revision as of 16:09, May 16, 2008
In regards to atheism and evolution, a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have been atheists.[1][2] Creationist scientists assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.[3]
Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the United States.
- Darwinian evolutionary theory, at least in the mind of John Q. Public, is the number one argument for atheism. [1]
See Also
Notes
- ↑ Dr. Don Batten, A Who’s Who of evolutionists Creation 20(1):32 December 1997.
- ↑ Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.,F.M., Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1, Facts and Bias
- ↑ http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/