Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Novels"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dadsnagem2 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Not all books are novels. I think its a useful sub-category. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | :Not all books are novels. I think its a useful sub-category. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. [[User:IndianaJ|IndianaJ]] 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:26, April 29, 2008
This category seems to be redundant when compared to Category:Books. If there are no objections, I can go through and put everything from this category into the other one. IndianaJ 16:37, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- Not all books are novels. I think its a useful sub-category. Dadsnagem2 17:24, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- That's why I suggested moving the things from the Novels cat to the Books cat, and not vice versa. IndianaJ 17:26, 29 April 2008 (EDT)