Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shark"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Article requires deletion/redirection. SYSOP take note please.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This article is full of misinformation, probably written by a vandal. I came across a blank page for [[sharks]] in which I created a stub. Perhaps this should be used for the basis of a better article?
 
This article is full of misinformation, probably written by a vandal. I came across a blank page for [[sharks]] in which I created a stub. Perhaps this should be used for the basis of a better article?
 +
 +
The portions that are accurate (around the clever "mammal" references etc) appear also to be largely lifted out of Wikipedia, almost word-for-word.  [[User:Zondergard|Zondergard]] 20:59, 16 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:59, March 17, 2007

This article is full of misinformation, probably written by a vandal. I came across a blank page for sharks in which I created a stub. Perhaps this should be used for the basis of a better article?

The portions that are accurate (around the clever "mammal" references etc) appear also to be largely lifted out of Wikipedia, almost word-for-word. Zondergard 20:59, 16 March 2007 (EDT)