Difference between revisions of "Eminent domain"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Proof reading and removal of a biased and superfluous rant about republicans and corporations colluding to hurt small property owners.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Eminent domain is the right of government, under English and American law, to take private property for public use, such as building a courthouse or completing a highway.  The basis for eminent domain is the assertion by the sovereign of power over all land in its jurisdiction.   
 
Eminent domain is the right of government, under English and American law, to take private property for public use, such as building a courthouse or completing a highway.  The basis for eminent domain is the assertion by the sovereign of power over all land in its jurisdiction.   
  
−
Under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government must pay "just compensation" to the owner of the private property that is taken.  However, w"just compensation" usually does not include intangible values of the property, such as its business good will with customers or its personal sentimental value.  Often "just compensation" is set by a condemnation hearing that does not even give fair market value.
+
Under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government must pay "just compensation" to the owner of the private property that is taken.  However, "just compensation" usually does not include intangible values of the property, such as its business good will with customers or its personal sentimental value.  Often "just compensation" is set by a condemnation hearing that does not even give fair market value.
  
−
In the decision of ''Kelo v. New London'' (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to include "public purpose" such as increased tax revenues as a substitute for "public use" in eminent domain.  This enables towns to take private property from homeowners and small businesses to give the property to large corporations, such as large retail "box" stores like Home Depot.  This sparked a public outrage and several state courts (e.g., Michigan and Ohio) have required public use, as have several state legislators. As recent history (need citation) shows, many Republican state legislators have ignored this outrage and shown their love for large corporations by using Eminent Domain to destroy small communities, hurt the common citizen, and encourage said large corporations to give them campaign donations.
+
In the decision of ''Kelo v. New London'' (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to include "public purpose" such as increased tax revenues as a substitute for "public use" in eminent domain.  This enables towns to take private property from homeowners and small businesses to give the property to large corporations, such as large retail "box" stores like Home Depot.  This sparked a public outrage and several state courts (e.g., Michigan and Ohio) have required public use, as have several state legislators.
  
 
The term "eminent domain" was first coined by [[Hugo Grotius]] in 1625.  [Note:  in a mistake in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it says the term originated in 1783.]
 
The term "eminent domain" was first coined by [[Hugo Grotius]] in 1625.  [Note:  in a mistake in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it says the term originated in 1783.]

Revision as of 23:16, March 16, 2007

Eminent domain is the right of government, under English and American law, to take private property for public use, such as building a courthouse or completing a highway. The basis for eminent domain is the assertion by the sovereign of power over all land in its jurisdiction.

Under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government must pay "just compensation" to the owner of the private property that is taken. However, "just compensation" usually does not include intangible values of the property, such as its business good will with customers or its personal sentimental value. Often "just compensation" is set by a condemnation hearing that does not even give fair market value.

In the decision of Kelo v. New London (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to include "public purpose" such as increased tax revenues as a substitute for "public use" in eminent domain. This enables towns to take private property from homeowners and small businesses to give the property to large corporations, such as large retail "box" stores like Home Depot. This sparked a public outrage and several state courts (e.g., Michigan and Ohio) have required public use, as have several state legislators.

The term "eminent domain" was first coined by Hugo Grotius in 1625. [Note: in a mistake in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, it says the term originated in 1783.]