Difference between revisions of "Talk:Republican Party"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Yes, where is the CRITICISM section?? I respect that this site wants to slant its information to the right wherever possible, but the misalignment between the two party pages only makes this site look like a farse. | Yes, where is the CRITICISM section?? I respect that this site wants to slant its information to the right wherever possible, but the misalignment between the two party pages only makes this site look like a farse. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suspect these will probably be removed by nervous conservative moderators. Nevertheless, here a few common criticisms the Republican Party: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1) The [[Republican Party]] is often jokingly called "pro-pollution" in that they vigorously fight policies on environmental reforms. This is most apparent in the current [[Global Warming]] debates. These positions are due in large part to the party's long-standing ties with the energy sector and their lobbyists. The current president and his vice president, for example, are both former oil company executives. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2) The current administration has pushed the [[national debt]] to record levels due to excessive spending on its highly contentious war. Such practices go against the GOP's standard positions on big government and high taxes. | ||
Revision as of 20:14, March 16, 2007
Contemporary Party
The contemporary Republican Party represents a wide array of interests such as the conservative evangelicals and the economic libertarians. The party has had some internal conflict over attitudes about how governments should run and how large they should be, what the party stands for, and what the party's attitude towards neo-conservatism should be especially in regard to foreign policy. The party is also divided over immigration issues with some members (such as George Bush) favoring workers visas and permits and some other members favoring strict control of immigration and strong action against illegal immigration. Recently, in what is seen as a slight change in policy direction, the Republican Party has taken on several of the tenets of national socialism. " Go Jesus!!!!!
This is getting worse than Wiki.....
--TK 19:45, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
- FYI: "Wiki" refers to the type of software used. Conservapedia is a "Wiki". --Hojimachongtalk 19:47, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
LOL...That's the Trouble with being Ernest. I think people know what I meant. --TK 20:11, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Shouldn't we put a "criticism" section in the article, like in the Democratic Party article? Seems to me that would be a fair and balanced approach to the topic.McTavidge 23:36, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
It probably won't matter until someone has reasoned, meaningful criticism to add. Being as this is Conservapedia, a serious criticism isn't extraordinarily likely to come from a serious contributor... you'd have it largely used for vandalism, or the criticisms presented would probably be deleted in short order. Zondergard
Yes, where is the CRITICISM section?? I respect that this site wants to slant its information to the right wherever possible, but the misalignment between the two party pages only makes this site look like a farse.
I suspect these will probably be removed by nervous conservative moderators. Nevertheless, here a few common criticisms the Republican Party:
1) The Republican Party is often jokingly called "pro-pollution" in that they vigorously fight policies on environmental reforms. This is most apparent in the current Global Warming debates. These positions are due in large part to the party's long-standing ties with the energy sector and their lobbyists. The current president and his vice president, for example, are both former oil company executives.
2) The current administration has pushed the national debt to record levels due to excessive spending on its highly contentious war. Such practices go against the GOP's standard positions on big government and high taxes.