Difference between revisions of "Talk:Massachusetts liberal"
m (Reverted edits by Blessthismess (Talk); changed back to last version by Lensboy) |
(Is this for real?) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
-I agree. Only the first four words are relevant to the article title. The stats belong in the MA article. [[User:Bomber23k|Bomber23k]] | -I agree. Only the first four words are relevant to the article title. The stats belong in the MA article. [[User:Bomber23k|Bomber23k]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree with y'all. This "article" doesn't even discuss what a specific liberal from MA would believe/do/say/etc. Instead, it raises petty concerns over MA generally. Get rid of this. --[[User:DJBlair|DJBlair]] 15:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:23, March 25, 2008
So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[1], one of the lowest crime rates. [2], [3], [4], one of the lowest murder rates [5] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? JoshuaZ 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST)
- This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. DDG 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Do we really need this article
I am very conservative but I don't see a need for this article. Why not simply include it in the MA article. Conservative 22:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
-I agree. Only the first four words are relevant to the article title. The stats belong in the MA article. Bomber23k
I agree with y'all. This "article" doesn't even discuss what a specific liberal from MA would believe/do/say/etc. Instead, it raises petty concerns over MA generally. Get rid of this. --DJBlair 15:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT)