Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ninj4"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
You did not back them up with any citation. They are your mere opinions. The warning stands. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 19:53, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | You did not back them up with any citation. They are your mere opinions. The warning stands. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 19:53, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
:I fail to see the other entries backed up by citations either. In fact, I could just sum up as you being a person with a penchant for hypocrisy who blatantly ignores the 1st Amendment... oh, wait, wow. Whodathunk? [[User:Ninj4|Ninj4]] 20:09, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | :I fail to see the other entries backed up by citations either. In fact, I could just sum up as you being a person with a penchant for hypocrisy who blatantly ignores the 1st Amendment... oh, wait, wow. Whodathunk? [[User:Ninj4|Ninj4]] 20:09, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yes, you continue to harp on the 1st amendment. But opinions are for the talk page; facts are for the article. If you feel it is necessary to place a citation needed, code: <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki>, then be my guest. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 20:11, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
yes i aggre with him i think this site is controlling | yes i aggre with him i think this site is controlling | ||
Revision as of 00:11, March 16, 2007
|
Block Notice |
|---|---|
| Edits you have made violate The Conservapedia Commandments. Further violations may result in your username being blocked. |
--<<-David R->> 19:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- 1. They do not violate the commandments.
- 2. You are just upset because it makes YOU personally show up in a bad light.
- So how about cleaning up your act before starting yelling at people for telling the truth? Ninj4 19:51, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
You did not back them up with any citation. They are your mere opinions. The warning stands. --<<-David R->> 19:53, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- I fail to see the other entries backed up by citations either. In fact, I could just sum up as you being a person with a penchant for hypocrisy who blatantly ignores the 1st Amendment... oh, wait, wow. Whodathunk? Ninj4 20:09, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, you continue to harp on the 1st amendment. But opinions are for the talk page; facts are for the article. If you feel it is necessary to place a citation needed, code: {{fact}}, then be my guest. --<<-David R->> 20:11, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
yes i aggre with him i think this site is controlling