Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (italics) |
(improved #1 entry further) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
# no matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] caused it | # no matter what happens in the weather, [[global warming]] caused it | ||
| − | # belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one atheist who remained sane) | + | # belief that a [[correlation]] and/or [[causation]] (e.g., between [[atheism]] and [[suicide]]) can be disproved by a [[counterexample]] (e.g., one [[atheist]] who remained sane) |
# never admit shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves | # never admit shame for [[liberal]] behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves | ||
# [[free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion. | # [[free speech]] for anything and everything ... except the [[conservative]] truth, and religion. | ||
# [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed | # [[Hollywood]] promotion of [[abortion]] is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed | ||
# insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm | # insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm | ||
| − | # carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but an [[abortion]] somehow does not increase that risk | + | # carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but doing the opposite (an [[abortion]]) somehow does not increase that risk |
| − | # requesting increased spending by government to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency | + | # requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency |
# insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while censorship for anything is [[Christian]] | # insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-[[Christian]], while censorship for anything is [[Christian]] | ||
# insisting that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex | # insisting that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex | ||
Revision as of 13:17, February 20, 2008
Liberal logic is an argument by a liberal that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:
- no matter what happens in the weather, global warming caused it
- belief that a correlation and/or causation (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a counterexample (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
- never admit shame for liberal behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves
- free speech for anything and everything ... except the conservative truth, and religion.
- Hollywood promotion of abortion is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
- insisting that an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
- carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but doing the opposite (an abortion) somehow does not increase that risk
- requesting increased spending by government to reduce poverty, which actually poverty is increased by the dependency
- insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-Christian, while censorship for anything is Christian
- insisting that teaching abstinence does not reduce premarital sex
- denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
- insisting that increasing taxes must increase government revenue, when often people just work less and revenues then decline
- Even though the Supreme Court overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, Roe v. Wade cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by liberal deceit.)[1]
- The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women for centuries, but liberals find that illogical today
(add to list)
See also
- Liberal bias
- Liberal hysteria
- Liberal hate speech
- Liberal style
- Liberal denial
- Liberal obfuscation
- Liberal quotient
References
- ↑ See Jeffrey Toobin's The Nine.