Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pro-life"
(Remove statement?) |
(Edit war) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:"Due to rulings by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], the [[United States]] allows abortions at virtually any time in pregnancy. Many state [[government]]s even pay for abortions using taxpayer dollars." | :"Due to rulings by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], the [[United States]] allows abortions at virtually any time in pregnancy. Many state [[government]]s even pay for abortions using taxpayer dollars." | ||
It would be relevant to the [[abortion]] article, but I don't see the relation to "pro-life". [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:51, 14 February 2008 (EST) | It would be relevant to the [[abortion]] article, but I don't see the relation to "pro-life". [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:51, 14 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Edit war == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can we have some explanations about the edit war? I agree with the last edit, which was reverted (see above). As for what the SC cases actually said, why don't we find a reference either way instead of just reverting each other. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:48, 18 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:48, February 18, 2008
Maybe it should be noted that some so-called "pro-lifers" kill doctors. Very in favour of life, these pro-lifers.
Could someone please explain why the reason for the term "pro-life" is "liberal bias"? Especially when said reason (life begins at conception) is surely in accordiace with Conservapedia thinking? G7mzh 11:39, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
The claim that the Democratic party wishes to have no legal restrictions placed on abortion is just plain wrong. Alloco1 18:17, 30 September 2007 (EDT)
No mention of abortion clinic bombings/car-into-smashings? Barikada 23:23, 26 January 2008 (EST)
Remove statement?
Can the following statement be removed?
- "Due to rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court, the United States allows abortions at virtually any time in pregnancy. Many state governments even pay for abortions using taxpayer dollars."
It would be relevant to the abortion article, but I don't see the relation to "pro-life". HelpJazz 20:51, 14 February 2008 (EST)
Edit war
Can we have some explanations about the edit war? I agree with the last edit, which was reverted (see above). As for what the SC cases actually said, why don't we find a reference either way instead of just reverting each other. HelpJazz 17:48, 18 February 2008 (EST)