Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservapedia terms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sawneybeane (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: maybe we could borrow from [[Dusty Springfield]] and have "Son of a Preacher Man" ;-) [[User:Sawneybeane|Sawneybeane]] 09:05, 16 February 2008 (EST) | :: maybe we could borrow from [[Dusty Springfield]] and have "Son of a Preacher Man" ;-) [[User:Sawneybeane|Sawneybeane]] 09:05, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::PK is usually used as a derogatory term, while Minister's son is being used on CP as a complimentary description. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:10, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:10, February 16, 2008
Minister's son
Yes, okay, I can grant that this term was invented here. But why? Isn't it just different wording for what has long been known as a PK, or Preacher's kid? Perhaps I should invent the term Missionary's Son, despite the term MK or Missionary's kid already being in long use? Philip J. Rayment 09:00, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- Not familiar with "preacher's kid," and that sounds slightly derogatory. We wouldn't say "Kid of Man" instead of "Son of Man," would we? The Minister's son is to describe an insight that liberals deny.--Aschlafly 09:03, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- maybe we could borrow from Dusty Springfield and have "Son of a Preacher Man" ;-) Sawneybeane 09:05, 16 February 2008 (EST)
