Difference between revisions of "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(too much "allegedly" - burden of proof is on film critics)
(In a stunning example of deceit, it turns out the 2 of the 3 scientists who complained, said they would have done the interviews anyway)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==Backlash==
 
==Backlash==
  
−
Some of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably [[Richard Dawkins]], claim that they were deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message<ref name="nyt"/> (see [[deceit]]).
+
One of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably [[Richard Dawkins]], claimed that he was deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message<ref name="nyt"/> The other two scientists said they would have given on-screen interviews anyway.
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Revision as of 18:51, February 15, 2008

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is a documentary hosted by Ben Stein set for release in the spring of 2008, which recounts how people supporting intelligent design theory are suppressed and persecuted within schools, universities and the scientific community.[1] The film highlights several academic disputes which, according to Stein, demonstrate that scientists and educators who promote intelligent design are persecuted by the scientific establishment.[2] Examples given by the film include Richard Sternberg, a biologist and an unpaid research associate at the National Museum of Natural History, and Guillermo Gonzalez, a pro-Intelligent design astrophysicist denied tenure at Iowa State University in 2007.[3]

In the film's trailer, Stein states that there are "people out there who want to keep science in a little box where it can’t possibly touch God" and that "freedom of thought and freedom of inquiry have been expelled from publicly-funded high schools, universities and research institutions."[3]

The film also implies that Darwin's theory of evolution was responsible for the Holocaust,[4][5] a view which has previously been put forward by the Discovery Institute, a scientific think tank which endorses intelligent design.[6]

Backlash

One of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably Richard Dawkins, claimed that he was deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message[3] The other two scientists said they would have given on-screen interviews anyway.

See also

References